Mathurin Marc Olama Onana v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 1992 . Accordingly, we deny the

ON REHEARING
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2087
MATHURIN MARC OLAMA ONANA,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A73-556-660)
Submitted: November 16, 2005 Decided: January 11, 2006
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Kreiss, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler,
Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant
Director, Michelle E. Gorden, Senior Litigation Counsel, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*By unpublished per curiam opinion filed on September 23,
2005, we initially dismissed the petition for review as moot. We
subsequently granted Onana’s petition for panel rehearing, vacating
our earlier opinion.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Mathurin Marc Olama Onana, a native and citizen of
Cameroon, petitions for review of an August 4, 2004 order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his second motion to
reopen immigration proceedings. * We have reviewed the record and
the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its
discretion in denying the motion as untimely filed and as exceeding
the numerical limitations for motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(c)(2) (2005); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --