Aissatou Barry v. INS, 181 F.3d 587, 595 4th Cir. 1999 . We further find we have no jurisdiction to…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2077
AISSATOU BARRY,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A95-902-551)
Submitted: February 25, 2005 Decided: April 5, 2005
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danielle Beach-Oswald, NOTO & OSWALD, P.C., Washington, D.C., for
Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, James A.
Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Wagner D. Jackson, Jr., Office
of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Aissatou Barry, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
affirming and adopting the immigration judge’s order denying her
motion to reconsider. Because we find the immigration judge did
not abuse her discretion denying the motion to reconsider, we deny
the petition for review. Stewart v. INS, 181 F.3d 587, 595 (4th
Cir. 1999). We further find we have no jurisdiction to review the
immigration judge’s order denying Barry’s applications for asylum,
withholding from removal and withholding under the Convention
Against Torture. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d) (2000); Asika v.
Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 264, 267 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 125
S. Ct. 861 (2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --