The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2063•Eritrea Fisehaye v. JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General
04-2063Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 21, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2063
ERITREA FISEHAYE,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A79-469-407)
Submitted: January 12, 2005 Decided: January 21, 2005
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eritrea Fisehaye, Petitioner Pro Se. M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright,
Larry Patrick Cote, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Eritrea Fisehaye, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen immigration
proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and
find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Fisehaye,
No. A79-469-407 (B.I.A. July 30, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.