The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2044•Orville Arnett v. Raphael J. Grant
04-2044Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2044
ORVILLE ARNETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RAPHAEL J. GRANT,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY; ANTHONY M. MILEO;
WAYNE CURRY, County Executive for Prince
George’s County, Maryland,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-02-3861-AW)
Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 23, 2005
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orville Arnett, Appellant Pro Se. Krystal Quinn Alves, Kristin
Marie Hileman Adams, OFFICE OF LAW FOR PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY,
Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Orville Arnett appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action arising out of Arnett’s arrest. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Arnett v.
Grant, No. CA-02-3861-AW (D. Md. filed July 29, 2004; entered
July 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.