The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2042•Tawana S. Allen v. Iveys, a corporation
04-2042Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2042
TAWANA S. ALLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
IVEYS, a corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-04-309-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 20, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tawana S. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. John Doughty Cole, Sr.,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Tawana S. Allen appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Allen v. Iveys, No. CA-04-309-1
(M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.