The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1982•Homer Blackburn v. Sow Branch Coal Company
04-1982Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1982
HOMER BLACKBURN,
Petitioner,
versus
SOW BRANCH COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(03-0674-BLA)
Submitted: January 31, 2005 Decided: March 1, 2005
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Homer Blackburn, Petitioner Pro Se. Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura
Metcoff Klaus, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Jeffrey
Steven Goldberg, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Homer Blackburn seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s
denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-45
(2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s
decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
Board. See Blackburn v. Sow Branch Coal Co., No. 03-0674-BLA (BRB
June 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.