The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1981•James Chester Perkins v. Douglas Orr, Iii
04-1981Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 13, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1981
JAMES CHESTER PERKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOUGLAS ORR, III; UNKNOWN DEPUTY 1; UNKNOWN
DEPUTY 2; UNKNOWN DEPUTY 3; HORRY’S WRECKER
SERVICE; TOW TRUCK DRIVER; DIRECTOR OF
DETENTION FACILITY; JAILER; JASPER COUNTY
SHERIFF; JOHN DOE 1-20,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-04-835-9-8)
Submitted: December 17, 2004 Decided: January 13, 2005
Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Chester Perkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Chester Perkins appeals the district court’s order
substantially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Perkins v. Orr, No. CA-04-835-9-8 (D.S.C. July 1, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.