The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1907•Janet M. Deyerberg v. Bob Woodward
04-1907Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 17, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1907
JANET M. DEYERBERG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BOB WOODWARD; TONY KORNHEISER; THE WASHINGTON
POST COMPANY; CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS; VANITY
FAIR MAGAZINE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-04-1118-AW)
Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: May 17, 2005
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janet M. Deyerberg, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Janet M. Deyerberg appeals the district court order
dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failing to state
a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Deyerberg v. Woodward, No. CA-04-1118-AW (D. Md. June 17, 2004).
We deny Deyerberg’s motion for depositions. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.