The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1894•Laverne Sweeney v. RECREATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, a Maryland Corporation
04-1894Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1894
LAVERNE SWEENEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RECREATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, a
Maryland Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-158-WMN)
Submitted: November 30, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
LaVerne Sweeney, Appellant Pro Se. Barrett W. Freedlander, SAUL
EWING, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
LaVerne Sweeney appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to defendant. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Sweeney v.
Recreational Indus., Inc., No. CA-02-158-WMN (D. Md. June 15,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.