The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1874•John B. Kimble v. State Board of Elections
04-1874Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 1, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1874
JOHN B. KIMBLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; ROBERT L. ERLICH,
JR., Governor; R. KARL AUMANN, Secretary of
State; JOHN WILLIS, Secretary of State;
ADMINISTRATIVE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; NANCY
KOPP, in her official capacity as Secretary of
State,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
THE STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MARYLAND
ADMINISTRATIVE ELECTION BOARD; PARRIS N.
GLENDENING, Office of Governor of Maryland,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-02-
2984-8)
Submitted: November 19, 2004 Decided: February 1, 2005
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
John B. Kimble, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Michele Rowe, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Annapolis, Maryland; Maureen
Mullen Dove, Assistant Attorney General, Steven Marshall Sullivan,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
John B. Kimble appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Kimble v.
Maryland, No. CA-02-2984-8 (D. Md. June 10, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.