Lamine M. Diack v. Whole Foods Market, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1851
LAMINE M. DIACK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-03-
2417-8-RWT)
Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 19, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lamine M. Diack, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Semler, OGLETREE,
DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lamine M. Diack appeals the district court’s order
awarding summary judgment to the Defendant on his employment
discrimination action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Diack v.
Whole Foods Market, Inc., No. CA-03-2417-8-RWT (D. Md. June 8,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --