The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1846•Patricia Godfrey v. DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, all unknown persons or agents
04-1846Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 21, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1846
PATRICIA GODFREY; JOHN F. GODFREY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, all unknown
persons or agents; CINDY JUSTICE, Social
Worker; MALISSA HILL, Social Worker; DAVIE
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,
Mocksville, North Carolina,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-04-719-7)
Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 21, 2004
Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia Godfrey, John F. Godfrey, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
John and Patricia Godfrey appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice their civil action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Godfrey v. Davie
County, No. CA-04-719-7 (D.S.C. filed June 4 & entered June 7,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.