The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1723•Kamil A. Mesays v. David H. Hugel, Administrator Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration
04-1723Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1723
KAMIL A. MESAYS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID H. HUGEL, ADMINISTRATOR MARYLAND MOTOR
VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
04-1570-RDB)
Submitted: September 17, 2004 Decided: October 18, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kamil A. Mesays, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Kamil A. Mesays appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Mesays v. Hugel, No.
CA-04-1570-RDB (D. Md. May 28, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.