Josette M. Mills v. HECTOR BARRETO, Administrator

04-1705Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2005

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1705
JOSETTE M. MILLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HECTOR BARRETO, Administrator; U.S. SMALL
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; CHARLES GASTON; BETTY
VERSER; JIMMIE ANDERSON; THOMAS TOLAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-735)
Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 17, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Belva D. Newsome, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Paul J.
McNulty, United States Attorney, Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Josette M. Mills appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action arising
under the Rehabilitation Act and denying Mills’ motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and briefs and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Mills v. Barreto, No. CA-03-735 (E.D.
Va. Mar. 8, 2004, and Apr. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.