Lesia Herron v. Virginia Commonwealth University

04-1701Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 7, 2004

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1701
LESIA HERRON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Dennis W. Dohnal, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-03-590-3)
Submitted: October 13, 2004 Decided: December 7, 2004
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lesia Herron, Appellant Pro Se. James Christian Stuchell, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; David Lee
Ross, Pamela Finley Boston, VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2000), the parties consented to
exercise of the district court’s jurisdiction by a magistrate
judge.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lesia Herron appeals the magistrate judge’s order*
granting summary judgment for Virginia Commonwealth University
(“VCU”) on her racial discrimination action brought under Title VI
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Herron
v. VCU, No. CA-03-590-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 2004). We deny Herron’s
motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.