John L. Boyle, Jr v. Harford County

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1671
JOHN L. BOYLE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HARFORD COUNTY; HOWARD WALTER; RICHARD AIELLO;
COLBURN DORSEY; ELWOOD DEHAVEN; GARY SOHL;
JOSEPH P. MEADOWS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.
(CA-01-3200-BEL)
Submitted: January 12, 2005 Decided: January 25, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howard J. Needle, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. J. Joseph
Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Cynthia G. Peltzman,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, Robert S. McCord,

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
County Attorney, Philip S. Roberts, Deborah S. Duvall, Senior
Assistant County Attorneys, Bel Air, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

PER CURIAM:
John L. Boyle, Jr. appeals the district court’s order
summarily dismissing his claims for religious discrimination and
retaliation for whistle blowing, based on Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000); 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2000); the First Amendment; and the Public Policy of
the State of Maryland; and dismissing the remaining state law
claims without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order on the
reasoning of the district court. See Boyle v. Harford County, No.
CA-01-3200-BEL (D. Md. Apr. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --