Robert Whitehead v. JOHN VAN LLOYD, Attorney at Law

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1657
ROBERT WHITEHEAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN VAN LLOYD, Attorney at Law; BARR, WARNER,
LLOYD & HENIFIN LAW FIRM, in their official
and individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-03-3637-9)
Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Gerald Chambers, Jr.,
TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert Whitehead appeals the district court’s order
accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his tort action in which he alleged legal
malpractice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Whitehead v. Lloyd, No. CA-03-3637-9 (D.S.C. Apr. 20,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --