Thomas Hennessy v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company

04-1632Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 17, 2004

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1632
THOMAS HENNESSY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-64-BO)
Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Hennessy, Appellant Pro Se. Rosemary Gill Kenyon, Zebulon
Dyer Anderson, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL &
JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Hennessy appeals the district court’s judgment
granting Universal Underwriters Insurance Company’s motion to
dismiss and dismissing as untimely his employment discrimination
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Hennessy v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.,
No. CA-04-64-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.