Curlee Sherman v. Orangeburg County Sheriff’s Department

04-1583Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 20, 2004

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1583
CURLEE SHERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ORANGEBURG COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendant -Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (CA-04-513-5)
Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 20, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM:
Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s judgment
adopting the magistrate judge’s order that dismissed his complaint
pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman
v. Orangeburg County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-04-513-5 (D.S.C. filed
Apr. 21, 2004, entered Apr. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.