The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1575•Elvis George Moyer v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation
04-1575Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 26, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1575
ELVIS GEORGE MOYER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-00-581)
Submitted: October 1, 2004 Decided: October 26, 2004
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elvis George Moyer, Appellant Pro Se. Fred Thurman Hamlet, Sr.,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Elvis George Moyer appeals the district court’s order
awarding $3500 in attorneys fees to Defendant, the prevailing party
in this Title VII action. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) (2000); Fed.
R. Civ. P. 54(d). We conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion, and we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Moyer v. Smurfit-Stone, No. CA-00-581
(M.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.