The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1552•Curlee Sherman v. Greenpoint Credit
04-1552Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 20, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1552
CURLEE SHERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREENPOINT CREDIT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (CA-04-1036-5)
Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 20, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s judgment
adopting the magistrate judge’s order that dismissed his complaint
pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman
v. Greenpoint Credit, No. CA-04-1036-5 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 26, 2004,
entered Apr. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.