Curlee Sherman v. Parks

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1549
CURLEE SHERMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (CA-04-892-5)
Submitted: August 9, 2004 Decided: August 20, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s judgment
adopting the magistrate judge’s order that dismissed his complaint
pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman
v. Parks and Recreation Dep’t, No. CA-04-892-5 (D.S.C. Apr. 28,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --