The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1533•Willie D. Green v. Duke Energy Corporation, a/k/a Duke Energy Company
04-1533Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1533
WILLIE D. GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, a/k/a Duke Energy
Company,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CA-03-364)
Submitted: September 22, 2004 Decided: October 25, 2004
Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie D. Green, Appellant Pro Se. John James Doyle, Jr., Jill
Stricklin Cox, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, L.L.C., Winston-Salem,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Willie D. Green appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Green’s
employment discrimination lawsuit. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on
the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Duke Energy
Corp., No. CA-03-364 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.