The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1517•Barry Green, Jr v. Bombardier Capital, Incorporated
04-1517Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 8, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1517
BARRY GREEN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BOMBARDIER CAPITAL, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-03-4070-3-22BD)
Submitted: September 29, 2004 Decided: October 8, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Green, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan M. Milling, MCNAIR LAW
FIRM, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Barry Green, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting
Defendant’s motion to dismiss this civil action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Bombardier
Capital, No. CA-03-4070-3-22BD (D.S.C. filed Apr. 15, 2004; entered
April 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.