The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1492•Michael Enders v. Kathleen Cravedi
04-1492Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 23, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1492
MICHAEL ENDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KATHLEEN CRAVEDI,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
03-245-PJM)
Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Enders, Appellant Pro Se. Allan A. Noble, BUDOW & NOBLE,
P.C., Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael Enders appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his civil action, denying his motion for
reconsideration, and awarding attorney’s fees to Kathleen Cravedi.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Enders v. Cravedi, No. CA-03-245-PJM (D. Md. filed
Oct. 21, 2003 & entered Oct. 22, 2003; filed Jan. 15, 2004 &
entered Jan. 16, 2004; Mar. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.