The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1481•Charles Wilson v. SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Bristol, Virginia
04-1481Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1481
CHARLES WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Bristol, Virginia;
POLICE DEPARTMENT, Bristol, Virginia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-04-43-7)
Submitted: August 20, 2004 Decided: August 27, 2004
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charles Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilson v.
Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-04-43-7 (W.D. Va. filed Mar. 29, 2004 &
entered Mar. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.