The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1461•Lisa D. Bryan v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, A New Jersey Corporation
04-1461Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 4, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1461
LISA D. BRYAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, A New
Jersey Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
265-AMD)
Submitted: August 27, 2004 Decided: November 4, 2004
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lisa D. Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ross Niccolini,
MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lisa D. Bryan appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgement to the Defendant in this employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s thorough opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Bryan v. Lucent Techs., Inc., No. CA-03-265-AMD (D. Md.
Mar. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.