The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1443•Patricia I. James v. Office of Personnel Management
04-1443Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 17, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1443
PATRICIA I. JAMES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; JOHN ASHCROFT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
03-3517-JFM)
Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia I. James, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Patricia I. James appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for the Office of Personnel Management on
her action under the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See James v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., No. CA-03-3517-JFM (D.
Md. Mar. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.