Thurmond Guess v. the Benedict College

04-1396Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 8, 2004

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1396
THURMOND GUESS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE BENEDICT COLLEGE; DAVID H. SWINTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 04-1571
THURMOND GUESS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE BENEDICT COLLEGE; DAVID H. SWINTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-04-553-3; CA-04-743-3)
Submitted: August 20, 2004 Decided: September 8, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thurmond Guess, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Thurmond Guess appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his complaints without prejudice based on reports and
recommendations of two magistrate judges. We have reviewed the
records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Guess v. Benedict
College, No. CA-04-553-3 (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2004); Guess v. Benedict
College, No. CA-04-743-3 (D.S.C. Apr. 28, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.