The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1393•Millis J. Stokes v. RON ANGELONE, Director, individually
04-1393Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 15, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1393
MILLIS J. STOKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RON ANGELONE, Director, individually and in
his official capacity as Director of the
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of
Corrections,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (CA-03-869-3)
Submitted: September 1, 2004 Decided: September 15, 2004
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
JeRoyd Greene, III, ROBINSON AND GREENE, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellant. Jerry W. Kilgore, Attorney General, Edward M. Macon,
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Martha M. Parrish, Senior Assistant Attorney Generals, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Millis J. Stokes appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Stokes v. Angelone, No. CA-03-869-3 (E.D. Va.
Feb. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.