Alexander Pastene v. Beaufort County School District

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1346
ALEXANDER PASTENE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BEAUFORT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; HERMAN
GAITHER; CALVIN WHITE; OTIS SMITH; CARL
SIMMONS; MARK SEIGLE; HERBERT GLAZE; WILLIAM
EVANS; RICHARD MCCLURE; OFFICER HAYES,
Beaufort Police; CITY OF BEAUFORT POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-02-3880-9-2-23)
Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 3, 2004
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Pastene, Appellant Pro Se. Darra James Coleman, WOODS &
GIVENS, L.L.P., Lexington, South Carolina, Mary Bass Lohr, HOWELL,
GIBSON & HUGHES, P.A., Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Pastene appeals the district court’s order
adopting in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting
summary judgment to Defendants in Pastene’s employment
discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Pastene v. Beaufort County Sch. Dist., No.
CA-02-3880-9-2-23 (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --