The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1331•Tesfaye Teferi v. John Ashcroft
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1331
TESFAYE TEFERI,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A76-898-259)
Submitted: October 20, 2004 Decided: November 4, 2004
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oti W. Nwosu, Arthur D. Wright, III, Washington, D.C., for
Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J.
Scadron, Assistant Director, Genevieve Holm, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION
LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
Tesfaye Teferi, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board). The order denied his motion to reconsider the
Board’s denial of his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the
record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse
its discretion in denying Teferi’s motion to reconsider. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Teferi, No.
A76-898-259 (BIA Feb. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.