Elliott Cone, on behalf of E. H. Cone, III v. Randolph County Schools

04-1319Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 16, 2004

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1319
ELLIOTT CONE, on behalf of E. H. Cone, III;
NANCY CONE, on behalf of E. H. Cone, III,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
RANDOLPH COUNTY SCHOOLS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-02-1018-1)
Submitted: June 18, 2004 Decided: July 16, 2004
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elliott Cone, Nancy Cone, Appellants Pro Se. Donna Rhea Rascoe,
CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Elliott Cone and Nancy Cone appeal the district court’s
order granting summary judgment for Randolph County Schools on
their action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
20 U.S.C. § 1400-87 (2000), and its North Carolina counterpart,
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-106 (1999), brought on behalf of their child
E. H. Cone, III. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Cone v. Randolph County Sch., No. CA-02-
1018-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.