The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1318•Sara E. Parker v. Housing Authority of the City of Raleigh, North Carolina
04-1318Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 16, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1318
SARA E. PARKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-414-5-BR)
Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 16, 2004
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sara E. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Theophilus Francis,
FRANCIS & AUSTIN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sara E. Parker appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint alleging violations of the Fair Housing
Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. (2000), for failure to state a claim
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Parker v. Housing
Authority, No. CA-03-414-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.