The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1281•Tawana S. Ingram-Allen v. Ford Credit
04-1281Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1281
TAWANA S. INGRAM-ALLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FORD CREDIT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-03-199-1)
Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 3, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tawana S. Ingram-Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Lynn Ogburn, III,
Megan Tedrick, POYNER & SPRUILL, L.L.P., Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Tawana S. Ingram-Allen appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Ingram-Allen v. Ford Credit, No. CA-03-
199-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 26, 2004 & entered Feb. 27, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.