The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1280•Tawana S. Ingram-Allen v. IVEYS, (A Corp.)
04-1280Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1280
TAWANA S. INGRAM-ALLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
IVEYS, (A Corp.),
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-03-196-1)
Submitted: May 27, 2004 Decided: June 3, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tawana S. Ingram-Allen, Appellant Pro Se. James Bernard Spears,
Jr., John Doughty Cole, Sr., HAYNSWORTH, BALDWIN, JOHNSON &
GREAVES, L.L.C., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Tawana S. Ingram-Allen appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Ingram-Allen v. Iveys, No. CA-
03-196-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 26, 2004 & entered Feb. 27, 2004).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.