The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1279•Gilbert L. Spurlock v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
04-1279Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1279
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (CA-02-404-3)
Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 19, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gilbert L. Spurlock, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Henson Kinney, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action against the United States Army Corps of
Engineers. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Spurlock v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No.
CA-02-404-3 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 3, 2004). Spurlock’s motion for
appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.