Full text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1259
CLIFTON NICKLES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CATHERINE O’MALLEY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(CA-04-105-CCB)
Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: June 29, 2004
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clifton Nickles, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Clifton Nickles appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and motion
to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Nickles v. O’Malley, No. CA-04-105-CCB (D. Md.
(Jan. 21, 2004; Feb. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
