The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1256•Directv Incorporated v. Larry Key
04-1256Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 8, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1256
DIRECTV INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY KEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate
Judge. (CA-03-321)
Submitted: May 27, 2005 Decided: June 8, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis T. Brown, LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS T. BROWN, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellant. Elizabeth F. Edwards, Brian E. Pumphrey, MCGUIRE
WOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Larry Key appeals the magistrate judge’s orders imposing
sanctions against Key’s counsel for discovery abuses. * We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See DIRECTV,
Inc. v. Key, No. CA-03-321 (E.D. Va. Oct. 17 & Dec. 31, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.