Carman Williams Murray, a/k/a Carman Y. Williams v. Julius Murray, Sr

04-1229Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 22, 2004

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1229
CARMAN WILLIAMS MURRAY, a/k/a Carman Y.
Williams,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JULIUS MURRAY, SR.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MARNE SHERMAN; SHERMAN & BOUKNIGHT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-02-1050-3-22BD)
Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April 22, 2004
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carman Williams Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Julius Murray, Sr.,
Appellee Pro Se.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Carman Williams Murray appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to grant
summary judgment to Julius Murray and dismiss her tort claims as
meritless. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Murray v. Murray, No. CA-02-1050-3-22BD (D.S.C. Feb.
13, 2004). We deny the Appellant’s motion to strike Appellee’s
brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.