The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1226•Shunda T. Francis v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE
04-1226Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 3, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1226
SHUNDA T. FRANCIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF
JUVENILE JUSTICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-03-968-3)
Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shunda T. Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Shunda T. Francis appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Francis v.
Virginia, No. CA-03-968-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.