Joseph Larosa v. Joan Larosa

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1223
JOSEPH LAROSA; DOMINICK LAROSA,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
versus
JOAN LAROSA; VIRGIL B. LAROSA,
Defendants - Appellants,
and
WESBANCO; BANK ONE, WEST VIRGINIA, NA;
RUSSELL L. BONASSO; HARRISON COUNTY BANK,
Parties in Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. John S. Kaull,
Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-9-1)
Submitted: August 23, 2004 Decided: September 3, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Crim, MCNEER, HIGHLAND, MCMUNN & VARNER, L.C.,
Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellants. Gregory H. Schillace,
SCHILLACE LAW OFFICE, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Joan LaRosa and Virgil B. LaRosa appeal from the
magistrate judge’s order * determining that an “Order of Court”
entered in the District Court for the District of Maryland was a
final judgment in that action. The magistrate judge therefore
concluded that the Maryland judgment was properly registered in the
Northern District of West Virginia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963
(2000), and accordingly denied Joan and Virgil’s motion to quash
the registration of judgment. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs
and the record on appeal and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate
judge. See LaRosa v. LaRosa, No. CA-02-9-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 23,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --