Max Monroe v. City of Richmond

04-1221Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 17, 2004

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1221
MAX MONROE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF RICHMOND,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-03-914-3)
Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Max Monroe, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Barnett, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Max Monroe appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his civil action alleging violations of the American with
Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Monroe v. City of Richmond, No.
CA-03-914-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.