The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1210•United States of America v. Vaughn Clarke
04-1210Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 21, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1210
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; OFFICE OF FEDERAL
HOUSING, Enterprise Oversight,
Petitioners - Appellees,
versus
VAUGHN CLARKE,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
03-3440-DKC)
Submitted: December 3, 2004 Decided: January 21, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven M. Salky, ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for
Appellant. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Mark
Stern, Jeffrey A. Wadsworth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Vaughn Clarke appeals the district court’s order granting
the Government’s petition for summary enforcement of an
administrative subpoena and ordering Clarke to comply with the
subpoena. We have reviewed the parties’ submissions on appeal and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See United States v. Clarke, No. CA-
03-3440-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.