The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1207•Samuel Davis Pridgen v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation
04-1207Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 14, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1207
SAMUEL DAVIS PRIDGEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION; KEITH FULLER;
WRENN BULLOCK; MIKE REGISTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-102-7-F(1))
Submitted: September 9, 2004 Decided: September 14, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Davis Pridgen, Appellant Pro Se. Randall David Avram,
Richard David Haygood, KILPATRICK STOCKTON, LLP, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*Pridgen did not timely appeal the district court’s final
order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Davis Pridgen appeals the magistrate judge’s order
awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Appellees.* We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in his order. See
Pridgen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., No. CA-03-102-7-F(1) (E.D.N.C.
Jan. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.