The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1139•Henry T. Sanders v. the State of Maryland
04-1139Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1139
HENRY T. SANDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE STATE OF MARYLAND; PRINCE GEORGE’S
COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge.
(CA-03-3619-PJM)
Submitted: May 26, 2004 Decided: July 28, 2004
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry T. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Henry T. Sanders appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Sanders v. Maryland, No. CA-03-3619-PJM
(D. Md. filed Jan. 8, 2004 & entered Jan. 9, 2004). We also find
no error in the district court’s decision to return Sanders’
motions after closing the case. We deny all of Sanders’
outstanding motions, including his motions for vacation,
alterations, voluntary dismissal, settlement, to stay, and for oral
argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.