The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1123•Phillip L. Cameron v. Mtd Product Incorporated
04-1123Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1123
PHILLIP L. CAMERON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MTD PRODUCT INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-03-75)
Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip L. Cameron, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Francis McKenna,
MCKENNA & CHIODO, P.C., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Phillip L. Cameron appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for judgment by default and dismissing his
products liability diversity action as untimely. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cameron v. MTD
Product Inc., No. CA-03-75 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 7, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.