The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1119•Garri Shtein v. Bank of America, Fsb
04-1119Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1119
GARRI SHTEIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BANK OF AMERICA, FSB,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-03-1159-CBD)
Submitted: May 7, 2004 Decided: June 1, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Garri Shtein, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Patrick McGlone, Todd
Russell Chason, GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Garri Shtein appeals the magistrate judge’s letter order
dismissing his discrimination and conspiracy to invade privacy
action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the magistrate judge. See Shtein v. Bank of America, No.
CA-03-1159-CBD (D. Md. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.