Wayne Rush Meadows v. E. G. FELDMAN, Sheriff

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7972
WAYNE RUSH MEADOWS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
E. G. FELDMAN, Sheriff; DANNY T. CALL,
Investigator; TIMOTHY K. SANNERS, Commonwealth
Attorney, Orange County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-03-101)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Rush Meadows, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Rush Meadows seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Meadows v.
Feldman, No. CA-03-101 (W.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --