The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-7969•Lawrence E. Griffin v. MARK WARNER, Governor
03-7969Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 4, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7969
LAWRENCE E. GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARK WARNER, Governor; ROBERT C. SCOTT,
Congressman; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL;
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA,
VIRGINIA; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; N. L.
CONNOR, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-03-515)
Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 4, 2004
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence E. Griffin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence E. Griffin appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this
appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Griffin v. Warner, No.
CA-03-515 (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.